LTE-5G-ORAN

LTE vs 5G SA Architecture Comparison

Advertisements

Both LTE and 5G (Fifth Generation) represent major advancements in wireless communications, but they differ significantly in their architectural design, performance, and deployment strategies. The transition from LTE to 5G is not just about faster speeds but also involves structural changes in network design, enhanced security, and a shift toward cloud-native implementations.

  • 5G Core (5GC) follows a service-based architecture (SBA), meaning functions communicate via APIs, whereas LTE’s EPC follows a monolithic approach.
  • Network slicing allows 5G to create virtual networks customized for different applications.
FeatureLTE (Evolved Packet Core – EPC)5G (5G Core – 5GC)
Architecture TypeCentralizedService-Based (Cloud-native)
Mobility ManagementHandled by MMEHandled by AMF
Data ForwardingS-GW & P-GWUPF (Distributed and Scalable)
Control & User Plane Separation (CUPS)Not fully implementedFully Implemented
Network SlicingNot SupportedSupported
QoS ModelFixed Bearer-BasedFlexible Flow-Based
Edge ComputingNot Natively SupportedFully Integrated
Interworking with Legacy NetworksSupports 2G/3GPrimarily Interworks with LTE
  • 5G gNB is split into CU (Centralized Unit) and DU (Distributed Unit), allowing for scalable deployments and centralized control.
  • LTE’s eNB does not support flexible architecture or multi-RAT integration as efficiently as 5G.
FeatureLTE (eNB)5G (gNB)
Access TechnologyOFDMA, SC-FDMAOFDMA, Flexible Numerology
Base Station TypesMacro eNBMacro gNB, Small Cells
BeamformingLimited SupportMassive MIMO and Beamforming
Latency in RAN~10ms~1ms
Frequency RangeUp to 6 GHzSub-6 GHz + mmWave (24GHz+)
ConnectivitySingle RAN OptionMulti-RAT with LTE, Wi-Fi, NR
DU-CU SplitNot ImplementedFully Supported
  • 5G introduces network slicing, allowing operators to allocate resources dynamically for IoT, URLLC, and eMBB applications.
  • LTE lacks such flexibility, making it inefficient for diverse use cases.
FeatureLTE5G
Network SlicingNot SupportedFully Supported
Function VirtualizationPartial NFV SupportFull NFV & SDN Integration
Cloud DeploymentLimitedFully Cloud-Native
Edge ComputingMinimalSupported via MEC
Dynamic Resource AllocationStaticAI-based Dynamic Allocation
  • 5G reduces latency 10x compared to LTE, enabling applications like autonomous driving, VR, and remote surgery.
FeatureLTE5G
Latency~10ms<1ms (URLLC)
Maximum Throughput~1 GbpsUp to 20 Gbps
Data SchedulingFixed Frame StructureFlexible Numerology
Peak Spectral Efficiency~15 bps/Hz~30 bps/Hz
HARQ Retransmission Time~8ms~2ms
  • 5G uses AMF for mobility management, reducing handover latency significantly.
FeatureLTE5G
Mobility Control FunctionMMEAMF
Handover Delay~50ms<10ms
X2 HandoverSupportedXn Handover for Lower Delay
Seamless RoamingLimitedEnhanced Support

Spectrum and Frequency Bands

  • 5G supports mmWave, which enables high-speed data transmission but requires denser deployments.
FeatureLTE5G
Frequency BandsSub-6 GHzSub-6 GHz + mmWave
Carrier AggregationLimited to 5 carriersSupports up to 16 carriers
Massive MIMOBasicAdvanced Beamforming

5G introduces encryption for subscriber IDs (SUPI) to prevent attacks.

FeatureLTE5G
AuthenticationStatic KeysDynamic SUPI Encryption
Signalling SecurityVulnerable to DoSSecure SBA Signalling
IoT SecurityWeakStronger Authentication for mMTC

5G enables new applications (AR, autonomous driving, industrial automation) that LTE cannot support.

Use CaseLTE5G
Smartphones & Mobile Broadband✓ (Higher Speed)
IoT & Smart CitiesLimited✓ (mMTC Support)
Autonomous Vehicles✓ (URLLC)
AR/VR & Gaming✓ (Low Latency)

One thought on “LTE vs 5G SA Architecture Comparison

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Discover more from Techlteworld

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Exit mobile version
%%footer%%